Barrett v. Air Brakes & Controls, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “existence of [an accord and satisfaction] becomes a matter of law only when the facts related thereto are not in dispute,” and that those facts include the existence of a “mutual agreement” between the parties
• declining to treat existence of accord and satisfaction as a question of fact where “the evidence on this point was conflicting”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).