Pierce v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a prior conviction of dealing cocaine could not be used to impeach a witness because it is not one of the “infamous crimes” enumerated in Evidence Rule 609(a) and was not a crime of dishonesty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lambert v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2001-03-05· cited 456×
• Gambill v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1996-12-18· cited 74×
• Taylor v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1997-05-12· cited 27×
• Rhodes v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2002-07-29· cited 11×
• Jenkins v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1997-03-27· cited 9×
• Davis v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1995-08-21

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Delaware v. Van Arsdall
  Supreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
• Pointer v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
• Alford v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1931-02-24· cited 1,352×
• Smith v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1968-01-29· cited 763×
• Ashton v. Anderson
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1972-02-28· cited 210×
• Terry v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1984-07-09· cited 138×
• Boze v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1987-10-19· cited 37×
• Pigg v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1992-11-23· cited 27×
• Johnston v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1988-01-08· cited 21×
• Turnbow v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1994-07-19· cited 16×
• Crull v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1989-07-07· cited 14×
• Weaver v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1994-01-18· cited 7×
• Pigg v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1992-05-11· cited 5×