Supreme Court of Delaware· 1/16/2009
Pierce v. State
Citations
- 966 A.2d 348
- 2009 WL 189150
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Because a motion for judgment of acquittal would not have succeeded under those circumstances, counsel's failure to make such motion does not constitute ineffective assistance.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holland, Berger and Jacobs, Justices
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Younger v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1990-07-27· cited 781×
- Flamer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1990-12-21· cited 248×
- Murphy v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1993-11-05· cited 160×
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1991-11-07· cited 51×
- Duross v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1985-06-13· cited 50×
- Barnett v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1997-03-20· cited 34×
- Morrisey v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1993-02-02· cited 15×
- Pierce v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2006-11-08· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.