· 2/21/2025
Phoenix Management, Inc.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that trial court did not err in declin- ing to provide the defendant’s instruction regarding a cul- pable mental state because instruction did not articulate the legally correct culpable mental state
- concluding that the trial court did not err in refusing to give the defendant’s proposed instruc- tion because ORS 162.315 does not require that a defendant intentionally create a substantial risk of harm
- sua sponte overrul- ing prior Court of Appeals cases that the court interpreted to be inconsistent with subsequent Oregon Supreme Court precedent
- all elements other than venue, statute of limitations, and the like require mental state
- all elements other than venue, statute of limitations, and the like require mental state
- “[A] culpable mental state is required for Cite as 336 Or App 873 (2024) 877 each material element of the crime except for those relat- ing to the statute of limitations, jurisdiction, venue, and the like.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sweet
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.