Skip to main content
· 12/10/2025

Phoenician Equity v. Dreambrands

Syllabus

1. Did the superior court abuse its discretion when is found the petitioner made a sufficient showing that \preserving the evidence may prevent a failure or delay of justice\ even though the respondent said it already was preserving the records? 2. Did the superior court abuse its discretion when it found the petitioner made a sufficient showing its need for Rule 27 relief to prevent \a failure or delay of justice\? 3. Did the superior court abuse its discretion when it found the petitioner made a sufficient showing that it expects to be a party to an action but cannot currently bring or cause it to be brought?

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.