Phoenician Equity v. Dreambrands
Syllabus
1. Did the superior court abuse its discretion when is found the petitioner made a sufficient showing that \preserving the evidence may prevent a failure or delay of justice\ even though the respondent said it already was preserving the records? 2. Did the superior court abuse its discretion when it found the petitioner made a sufficient showing its need for Rule 27 relief to prevent \a failure or delay of justice\? 3. Did the superior court abuse its discretion when it found the petitioner made a sufficient showing that it expects to be a party to an action but cannot currently bring or cause it to be brought?
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.