Marquette Venture Partners II v. Leonesio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court appeals’s jurisdiction to review sufficiency of the evidence is limited by A.R.S. § 12– 2102(C)
• refusing to consider under A.R.S. § 12-2102(C) a challenge to a jury instruction based on the sufficiency of the evidence in the absence of a post-verdict motion
• “We are not . . . prohibited from considering constitutional arguments raised for the first time on appeal.”
• interpreting Rule 50(a) and 50(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).