Phillips v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting, in the context of a directed-verdict motion, that the reason for requiring the defense to clearly and specifically articulate deficiencies in the State’s case is to allow the circuit court to provide an opportunity for the State to rectify the deficiency

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Green v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2006-03-09· cited 71×
• Pinell v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2005-12-08· cited 46×
• Lamb v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2008-02-07· cited 41×
• Goodwin v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2008-03-20· cited 15×
• Sauerwin v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2005-09-29· cited 14×
• Ray v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2009-10-29· cited 13×
• Yankaway v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2006-03-23· cited 9×
• Washington v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2010-09-15· cited 8×
• Matar v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2016-05-04· cited 7×
• Ingle v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2010-05-12· cited 4×
• Turner v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2008-10-08· cited 3×
• Pedro Velazquez v. State of Arkansas
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2022-08-31· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Tester v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2000-11-09· cited 32×
• Weston v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1979-02-12· cited 23×
• Patrick v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1993-10-04· cited 12×
• Hunt v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2003-11-13· cited 11×
• State v. Fuson
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2004-01-29· cited 10×
• Maxwell v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2004-11-04· cited 9×
• Phillips v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2004-09-29· cited 5×