Sauerwin v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant’s confrontation rights were not violated when medical expert, who had not conducted autopsy on body of murder victim, testified 9 regarding cause of victim’s death
• finding no prejudice from a medical examiner’s testimony regarding an autopsy report prepared by another examiner when the cause of death was not disputed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).