Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1/23/1985
Phillips v. Baker
Citations
- 325 S.E.2d 533
- 284 S.C. 134
- 1985 S.C. LEXIS 311
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that duress is a condition of the mind produced by improper pressure that causes a person to do an act not of his own volition
- noting that duress is a condition of the mind produced by improper pressure that causes a person to do an act not of his own volition
- finding the biological mother failed to establish she executed the consent form under duress
- finding the biological mother failed to establish she executed the consent form under duress
- “An adoption proceeding being a matter in equity heard by the trial judge alone, this Court’s scope of review extends to the finding of facts based on its own view of the preponderance of the evidence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chandler, Littlejohn, Ness, Gregory, Harwell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hooper v. RockwellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-02-22· cited 91×
- Randolph Johnson, Jr. v. City of Columbia, South Carolina, Randolph Johnson, Jr. v. The City of ColumbiaFourth Circuit· 1991-11-22· cited 46×
- Hooters of America, Inc. v. PhillipsD. South Carolina· 1998-03-12· cited 36×
- McCann v. DoeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-04-07· cited 16×
- Hyman v. Ford Motor Co.D. South Carolina· 2001-02-22· cited 14×
- Johnson v. Horry County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-06-09· cited 6×
- Doe v. QueenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-07-17· cited 2×
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. Palmetto FortD. South Carolina· 1993-08-26· cited 2×
- In Re Sea Turtle Cinemas, Inc.D. South Carolina· 2010-12-09· cited 1×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-01-22· cited 749×
- Mitchell v. MitchellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1984-08-27· cited 54×
- S. O. v. W. S.Alaska Supreme Court· 1982-04-30· cited 28×
- DRIGGERS ET UX. v. JolleySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1951-03-08· cited 16×
- Baker v. BakerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-06-09· cited 13×
- Hendrix v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1959-06-17· cited 11×
- Thomas R. v. South Carolina Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-03-02· cited 11×
- Ellison v. CambySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-06-28· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.