Third Circuit· 4/19/2017
Philip Wharton v. Carl Danberg
Citations
- 854 F.3d 234
- 2017 WL 1394791
- 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 6716
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming district court’s dismissal of substantive due process claims that were parallel to Eighth Amendment claims under the more-specific-provision rule
- “[S]peculation and conjecture may not defeat a motion for summary judgment[.]” (alterations in original) (quoting Acumed LLC v. Advanced Surgical Servs., Inc., 561 F.3d 199, 228 (3d Cir. 2009))
- “Suits against high-level government officials must satisfy the general requirements for supervisory liability.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jordan, Greenaway, Rendell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Alanda Forrest v. Kevin ParryThird Circuit· 2019-07-10· cited 525×
- Ernest Porter v. Pennsylvania Department of CorThird Circuit· 2020-09-01· cited 218×
- Qing Qin v. Vertex IncThird Circuit· 2024-05-02· cited 76×
- Davis v. StateNebraska Supreme Court· 2017-10-06· cited 55×
- Jason Ali v. Woodbridge Township School DisThird Circuit· 2020-04-22· cited 55×
- Hall-Wadley v. Maint. Dep'tE.D. Pennsylvania· 2019-06-27· cited 40×
- Donald Delade v. John CarganThird Circuit· 2020-08-25· cited 25×
- NRA Group LLC v. Nicole DurenleauThird Circuit· 2025-08-26
- Andrew Perrong v. Matthew BradfordThird Circuit· 2025-10-06
- NRA Group LLC v. Nicole DurenleauThird Circuit· 2025-10-07
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court· 1979-05-14· cited 11,438×
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court· 2011-06-20· cited 4,653×
- United States v. LanierSupreme Court· 1997-03-31· cited 2,070×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1999-06-29· cited 1,308×
- Taylor v. BarkesSupreme Court· 2015-06-01· cited 937×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 2001-06-11· cited 792×
- Betts v. New Castle Youth Development CenterThird Circuit· 2010-09-13· cited 717×
- Barkes Ex Rel. Barkes v. First Correctional Medical, Inc.Third Circuit· 2014-09-05· cited 626×
- In Re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust LitigationThird Circuit· 2009-01-16· cited 549×
- Giles v. KearneyThird Circuit· 2009-07-15· cited 522×
- Moore v. TartlerThird Circuit· 1993-03-01· cited 446×
- Sample v. DiecksThird Circuit· 1989-09-12· cited 364×
- Frank Haygood v. Evelle J. Younger, and Harold Cranke and Benjamin SeymourNinth Circuit· 1985-08-27· cited 363×
- ACUMED LLC v. Advanced Surgical Services, Inc.Third Circuit· 2009-03-20· cited 337×
- Hubbard v. TaylorThird Circuit· 2005-02-23· cited 328×
- Boring v. KozakiewiczThird Circuit· 1987-11-16· cited 241×
- Lexington Insurance Company v. Western Pennsylvania HospitalThird Circuit· 2005-09-09· cited 129×
- Montanez v. ThompsonThird Circuit· 2010-04-22· cited 102×
- Kent Alexander v. William Perrill and Luis RiveraNinth Circuit· 1990-10-10· cited 91×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.