Ninth Circuit· 4/25/2023
Philip Galanti v. Ndoc
Citations
- 65 F.4th 1152
Oral argument
- ListenArgued24 min recording
Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining the distinction between a challenge to an underlying conviction or sentence and a challenge to the loss of prison credit deductions
- explaining that Spencer suggested that Heck does not bar a §1983 claim if it 3 would be impossible as a matter of law for a plaintiff to meet the favorable termination requirement due to the unavailability of habeas relief (citing Spencer, 523 U.S. at 21
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court· 1994-06-24· cited 15,294×
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court· 1998-03-03· cited 3,515×
- Edwards v. BalisokSupreme Court· 1997-05-19· cited 2,485×
- Guerrero v. GatesNinth Circuit· 2006-03-27· cited 223×
- Narvis G. Nonnette v. Larry Small R. Schelke E. Castro D. Johnson M.A. Corbin J. BuiltmanNinth Circuit· 2002-12-26· cited 194×
- Thompson v. DavisNinth Circuit· 2002-08-05· cited 142×
- Moor v. PalmerNinth Circuit· 2010-04-29· cited 84×
- James Lyall v. City of Los AngelesNinth Circuit· 2015-12-04· cited 84×
- Arizona Dream Act Coalition v. Janice BrewerNinth Circuit· 2017-02-02· cited 70×
- Michael D. McFarland v. Robert J. CassadyNinth Circuit· 1986-01-07· cited 66×
- Ventura Mobilehome Communities Owners Association, an Unincorporated Association v. City of San BuenaventuraNinth Circuit· 2004-06-10· cited 54×
- Reynaldo Gonzalez v. Google LLCNinth Circuit· 2021-06-22· cited 46×
- Robert Bergen v. James Spaulding, SuperintendentNinth Circuit· 1989-08-03· cited 43×
Other cases named Philip Galanti v. Ndoc
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.