Pharr v. Continental Cas. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that eight-month delay between suit being filed and insurer being notified constituted unreasonable delay
• holding that an eight-month delay without excuse was unreasonable as a matter of law
• holding that an eight-month delay without excuse was unreasonable as a matter of law
• holding that an eight-month delay without excuse was unreasonable as a matter of law
• finding that an eight-month delay required the insured to explain the reasons for the delay
• finding that an eight-month delay in providing notice of loss to an insurer with no reason for the delay was unreasonable as a matter of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).