United States Fidelity & Guar. Co. v. BONITZ, ETC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a five- year delay in providing notice to the insurer was not unreasonable under the circumstances of the case
• stating that claims for negligence do not preclude findings of an occurrence because negligence claims do not require an expectation or intent to cause damage
• all holding that faulty or defective workmanship is an accident and therefore an “occurrence” under the terms of an insurance policy
• five year delay in providing notice to the insurer was not unreasonable under the circumstances of the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).