Skip to main content

Peterson v. State

Citations

  • 909 N.E.2d 494
  • 2009 Ind. App. LEXIS 966
  • 2009 WL 2030557

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by revoking the defendant’s entire suspended sentence when he violated probation at the end of his probationary period by viewing pornography in violation of his treatment contract and conditions of probation
  • holding evidence was sufficient defendant watched pornographic movies in violation of his sex offender treatment contract and, thus, violated a condition of his probation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: May

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.