Indiana Court of Appeals· 7/14/2009
Peterson v. State
Citations
- 909 N.E.2d 494
- 2009 Ind. App. LEXIS 966
- 2009 WL 2030557
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by revoking the defendant’s entire suspended sentence when he violated probation at the end of his probationary period by viewing pornography in violation of his treatment contract and conditions of probation
- holding evidence was sufficient defendant watched pornographic movies in violation of his sex offender treatment contract and, thus, violated a condition of his probation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: May
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Deriq Watters v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2014-11-21· cited 3×
- Dameco Brent v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2016-08-25
- Dominic Jones v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-02-17
- Matthew A. Sokolowski v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-04-15
- Leosthene Morissette v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-12-21
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cox v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-03-03· cited 320×
- Reyes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2007-06-21· cited 128×
- Marsh v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-11-24· cited 46×
- C.S. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-09-08· cited 25×
- Podlusky v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-12-16· cited 13×
- Hamed v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-08-15· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.