Supreme Court of Connecticut· 3/31/1998
Peter-Michael, Inc. v. Sea Shell Associates
Citations
- 244 Conn. 269
- 709 A.2d 558
- 1998 Conn. LEXIS 95
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- while not deciding issue of whether right of first refusal was limited to lease term, concluding that plaintiff's claim was legally sufficient to survive a motion to strike
- intent is a question of fact
- intent is a question of fact
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Norcott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Tallmadge Bros. v. Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-03-15· cited 222×
- Bhinder v. Sun Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-08-11· cited 87×
- D'Amico v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-06-22· cited 34×
- In Re Enron Corp. Securities, DerivativeS.D. Texas· 2005-02-16· cited 26×
- B & D Associates Inc. v. RussellConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-10-15· cited 24×
- Fiorelli v. GorskyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-04-06· cited 17×
- Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. VaszilSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-07-11· cited 14×
- In Re Sheneal W. Jr.Connecticut Superior Court· 1999-01-22· cited 12×
- Ameriquest Mortgage Co. v. LaxConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-04-14· cited 9×
- Marquardt & Roche/Meditz & Hackett, Inc. v. Riverbend Executive Center, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2003-01-07· cited 9×
- Federal Insurance Co. v. Speedboat Racing Ltd.D. Connecticut· 2016-08-09· cited 8×
- Tinaco Plaza, LLC v. Freebob's, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2003-02-04· cited 8×
- Kutkowski v. Princeville Prince Golf Course, LLCHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2012-03-20· cited 4×
- Cohen v. Postal Holdings, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court· 2020-07-28· cited 3×
- Cogdill v. Sylva Supply Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2019-05-07· cited 2×
- Keeper's, Inc. v. ATGCKG Realestate, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court· 2013-11-26· cited 2×
- Durante v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court· 2011-04-08
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Faulkner v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-04-22· cited 812×
- Waters v. AutuoriSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-05-07· cited 485×
- Parsons v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-09-02· cited 482×
- Michaud v. WawruckSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-12-20· cited 166×
- Water & Way Properties v. Colt's Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-08-09· cited 156×
- Skuzinski v. Bouchard Fuels, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-05-06· cited 152×
- Warner v. KonoverSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-02-21· cited 137×
- Collins v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1973-02-21· cited 128×
- Sassone v. LeporeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-03· cited 127×
- Lonergan v. Connecticut Food Store, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1975-03-18· cited 67×
- Klein v. ChatfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1974-02-26· cited 62×
- Central New Haven Development Corporation v. La Crepe, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-04-03· cited 48×
- Hare v. McClellanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-08-01· cited 44×
- Ingalls v. Roger Smith Hotels CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1955-11-15· cited 34×
- Perruccio v. AllenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1968-03-20· cited 27×
- Douglass v. JonesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-11-24· cited 21×
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. Buram Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals· 1962-04-26· cited 20×
- Ardito v. HowellCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 1947-03-12· cited 12×
- Carroll v. DaigleSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1983-07-13· cited 11×
- Shuford Development Company v. Chrysler CorporationFifth Circuit· 1971-09-21· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.