Skip to main content
· 1/11/2016

Peter Enger v. Chicago Carriage Cab Corp.

Citations

  • 812 F.3d 565
  • 25 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1497
  • 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 388
  • 2016 WL 106878

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the IWPCA requires that a plaintiff demonstrate that they are owed compensation pursuant to a contractual agreement
  • unjust-enrichment claim cannot be brought when it challenges the terms of an implied contract between the parties
  • “The IWPCA allows for a cause of action based on wrongfully held compensation pursuant to a contract or agreement.”
  • unjust enrichment in- applicable where the parties’ relationship governed by im- plied contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Williams, Sykes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.