Skip to main content
· 9/13/2004

Utility Audit, Inc. v. Horace Mann Service Corporation

Citations

  • 383 F.3d 683
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 19167
  • 2004 WL 2029317

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that, under Ulinois law, a contract dispute is suitable for summary judgment where the dispute involves the “interpretation of an unambiguous contract”
  • affirming summary judgment in a breach of contract suit and noting that “[t]he interpretation of an unambiguous contract is a question of law” and disputes over unambiguous terms are appropriate for summary judgment
  • in determining whether a claim falls outside a contract, the subject matter of the contract governs, not whether the contract contains terms or provisions related to the claim
  • “In determining whether a claim falls outside a contract, the subject matter of the contract governs, not whether the contract contains terms or provisions related to the claim.”
  • “Under Illinois law . . . contract terms are interpreted according to their plain meaning unless otherwise defined.”
  • “When two parties' relationship is governed by contract, they may not bring a claim of unjust enrichment unless the claim falls outside the contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Ripple, Rovner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.