E.D. Arkansas· 8/28/1986
Perry v. Lockhart
Citations
- 656 F. Supp. 46
- 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21025
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \the `novelty' of the pecuniary gain argument at the time of Perry's trial was sufficient to provide `cause' for his failure to raise this question\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eisele
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 5,066×
- Zant v. StephensSupreme Court· 1983-06-22· cited 2,410×
- Godfrey v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1980-05-19· cited 1,672×
- Reed v. RossSupreme Court· 1984-06-27· cited 1,249×
- Carl Albert Collins v. A.L. Lockhart, Director of the Arkansas Department of CorrectionEighth Circuit· 1985-04-24· cited 165×
- Singleton v. LockhartE.D. Arkansas· 1986-08-28· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.