· 8/28/1986
Perry v. Lockhart
Citations
- 656 F. Supp. 46
- 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21025
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \the `novelty' of the pecuniary gain argument at the time of Perry's trial was sufficient to provide `cause' for his failure to raise this question\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eisele
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.