Skip to main content
· 8/28/1986

Perry v. Lockhart

Citations

  • 656 F. Supp. 46
  • 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21025

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \the `novelty' of the pecuniary gain argument at the time of Perry's trial was sufficient to provide `cause' for his failure to raise this question\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eisele

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.