Skip to main content
· 6/22/2010

Perry v. Honorable Emmet Ronan

Citations

  • 234 P.3d 617
  • 225 Ariz. 49
  • 585 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 56
  • 2010 Ariz. App. LEXIS 104

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Rule 80(d) does not apply because the client “only disputes whether he is bound to the settlement agreement; the agreement’s existence and terms are not in dispute”
  • holding that Rule 80(d) does not apply because the client “only disputes whether he is bound to the settlement agreement; the agreement’s existence and terms are not in dispute”
  • “[A]n action does not arise out of contract if the contract is only a factual predicate to the action but not the essential basis of it....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Orozco, Johnsen, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.