· 7/13/1989
Hays v. Fischer
Citations
- 777 P.2d 222
- 161 Ariz. 159
- 38 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 29
- 1989 Ariz. App. LEXIS 199
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- assuming that Rule 80(d) applies to settlement agreements, it has no application when neither the existence of the agreement nor its terms are in dispute
- “The execution of the release and stipulation was 24 not a condition precedent to the settlement agreement, but was an obligation [the plaintiff] 25 undertook when she entered into the settlement through [the defendant].”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Contreras, Kleinschmidt, Yoss
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.