Ninth Circuit· 4/9/2020

Perrin Davis v. Facebook, Inc.

Citations

956 F.3d 589

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that Facebook, when it intercepted communications between a user’s browser and a third-party website, was not as a matter of law a “party” to that communication
holding that when deciding a 20 motion to dismiss, “all allegations of material fact are taken as true and construed in the light 21 most favorable to the non-moving party”
explaining that full-string URLs can include “search terms inputted” and can “divulge a user’s personal interests [and] queries”
explaining that full-string URLs can include “search terms inputted” and can “divulge a user’s personal interests [and] queries”
holding “[a] reasonable expectation of privacy exists 7 where a defendant gains “unwanted access to data by electronic or other covert means, in violation 8 of the law or social norms.”
finding that plaintiffs 25 stated claims for invasion of privacy, intrusion upon seclusion, breach of contract, and claims 26 under the Wiretap Act and CIPA where Facebook allegedly tracked users’ browsing histories via 27 plug-ins

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.