Skip to main content
· 10/21/2004

McBride v. Boughton

Citations

  • 20 Cal. Rptr. 3d 115
  • 123 Cal. App. 4th 379
  • 2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9441
  • 2004 Daily Journal DAR 12899
  • 2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 1757

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • construing purported cause of action for unjust enrichment as attempt to plead cause of action giving rise to right to restitution
  • noting “[u]njust enrichment” 12 is a “general principle, underlying various legal doctrines and remedies”
  • noting “[u]njust 3 enrichment” is a “general principle, underlying various legal doctrines and remedies”
  • “Under the law of restitution, an individual is required to make restitution if he or she is unjustly enriched at the expense of another.”
  • “unjust enrichment is not a cause of action or even a remedy, but rather a general principle underlying various legal doctrines and remedies”
  • “Under the law of restitution, an individual is required to make restitution if he or she is unjustly enriched at the expense of another.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ruvolo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.