Perri v. Certified Languages International, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying “right to control” test to alleged violations of Oregon’s minimum wage and overtime statutes
• applying both state “right to control” test and federal “economic realities” test and noting that “[a]n independent contractor is not an ‘employee’ ” for purposes of state and federal minimum wage and overtime laws
• alleged violation of wage and overtime laws: “Oregon courts generally have used a common law ‘right to control’ test in determining the status of a worker. The principal factors under that test are (1) the right to, or the exercise of, control; (2
• alleged violation of wage and overtime laws: “Oregon courts generally have used a common law “right to control” test in determining the status of a worker. The principal factors under that test are (1) the right to, or the exercise of, control; (2
• alleged violation of wage and overtime laws: “Oregon courts generally have used a common law ‘right to control’ test in determining the status of a worker. The principal factors under that test are (1) the right to, or the exercise of, control; (2) the method of payment; (3
• alleged violation of wage and overtime laws: “Oregon courts generally have used a common law “right to control” test in determining the status of a worker. The principal factors under that test are (1) the right to, or the exercise of, control; (2) the method of payment; (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Matteo Brunozzi v. Cable Communications, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2017-03-21· cited 88×
• Cejas Commercial Interiors, Inc. v. Torres-Lizama
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-12-18· cited 20×
• In re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.
  N.D. Indiana· 2008-03-25· cited 16×
• In Re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc., Employment Practices Litigation
  N.D. Indiana· 2009-07-27· cited 15×
• Phelps v. 3PD, Inc.
  D. Oregon· 2009-09-30· cited 10×
• DiNicola v. State of Oregon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-11-09· cited 8×
• Walter v. Scherzinger
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-05-12· cited 8×
• In re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc., Employment Practices Litigation
  N.D. Indiana· 2012-04-24· cited 6×
• Goins v. WINCO FOODS, LLC
  D. Oregon· 2007-08-23

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 2,400×
• United States v. Silk
  Supreme Court· 1947-06-16· cited 647×
• Jones v. General Motors Corp.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1997-06-26· cited 448×
• Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. State
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2001-03-08· cited 428×
• Department of Revenue of Ore. v. ACF Industries, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1994-01-24· cited 313×
• Herman v. Express Sixty-Minutes Delivery Service, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 1998-12-09· cited 69×
• Checkley v. Boyd
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-11-08· cited 40×
• Schaff v. Ray's Land & Sea Food Co., Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2002-05-09· cited 37×
• Kahn v. Pony Express Courier Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-03-14· cited 27×
• Castle Homes, Inc. v. Whaite
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-02-22· cited 24×
• L & F DISTRIBUTORS v. Cruz
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1997-02-06· cited 17×
• Hagan v. Gemstate Manufacturing, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1999-05-20· cited 13×
• State Ex Rel. Roberts v. Acropolis McLoughlin, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-07-16· cited 6×
• State ex rel. Roberts v. Acropolis McLoughlin, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-09-24· cited 6×