Perri v. Certified Languages International, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying “right to control” test to alleged violations of Oregon’s minimum wage and overtime statutes
• applying both state “right to control” test and federal “economic realities” test and noting that “[a]n independent contractor is not an ‘employee’ ” for purposes of state and federal minimum wage and overtime laws
• alleged violation of wage and overtime laws: “Oregon courts generally have used a common law ‘right to control’ test in determining the status of a worker. The principal factors under that test are (1) the right to, or the exercise of, control; (2
• alleged violation of wage and overtime laws: “Oregon courts generally have used a common law “right to control” test in determining the status of a worker. The principal factors under that test are (1) the right to, or the exercise of, control; (2
• alleged violation of wage and overtime laws: “Oregon courts generally have used a common law ‘right to control’ test in determining the status of a worker. The principal factors under that test are (1) the right to, or the exercise of, control; (2) the method of payment; (3
• alleged violation of wage and overtime laws: “Oregon courts generally have used a common law “right to control” test in determining the status of a worker. The principal factors under that test are (1) the right to, or the exercise of, control; (2) the method of payment; (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).