Supreme Court· 3/25/1968
Permian Basin Area Rate Cases
Citations
- 390 U.S. 747
- 88 S. Ct. 1344
- 20 L. Ed. 2d 312
- 1968 U.S. LEXIS 2917
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the rates proposed would \maintain the industry's credit and continue to attract capital\
- noting that the rates proposed would “maintain the industry’s credit and continue to attract capital”
- noting that the width of administrative authority must be considered in the light of the purposes for which it is conferred and that Congress is presumed to give authority adequate to achieve those purposes with reasonable effectiveness
- noting that the width of administrative authority must be considered in the light of the purposes for which it is conferred and that Congress is presumed to give authority adequate to achieve those purposes with reasonable effectiveness
- recognizing the Federal Power Commission, “for purposes of rate regulation,” devised a “rate structure” by setting “two area maximum prices,” using the “legislative power to create price ceilings” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- upholding the authority of the FPC to establish a system of area rate regulation for large producers
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harlan, Douglas, Marshall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
859 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court· 1983-05-16· cited 17,202×
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court· 1983-06-24· cited 8,453×
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court· 1975-04-16· cited 2,322×
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court· 2000-03-28· cited 1,963×
- Rust v. SullivanSupreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 1,298×
- Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court· 1969-02-24· cited 1,076×
- Pennell v. City of San JoseSupreme Court· 1988-02-24· cited 609×
- Weinberger v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc.Supreme Court· 1973-06-18· cited 515×
- Greater Boston Television Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionD.C. Circuit· 1970-11-13· cited 508×
- Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. HallSupreme Court· 1981-07-02· cited 492×
- United States v. Southwestern Cable Co.Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 450×
- Federal Power Commission v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court· 1974-06-10· cited 435×
- Home Box Office, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Professional Baseball, IntervenorsD.C. Circuit· 1977-05-20· cited 403×
- Industrial Union Dept., AFL-CIO v. American Petroleum InstituteSupreme Court· 1980-07-02· cited 396×
- California ex rel Lockyer v. Dynegy, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2004-07-06· cited 379×
- Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court· 1989-05-04· cited 307×
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. TrainSupreme Court· 1977-02-23· cited 298×
- Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-06-16· cited 294×
- Scientists' Institute for Public Information, Inc. v. Atomic Energy CommissionD.C. Circuit· 1973-06-12· cited 292×
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange CommissionD.C. Circuit· 1979-07-20· cited 278×
Cites
39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1934-03-05· cited 1,848×
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court· 1944-02-07· cited 1,523×
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1877-03-18· cited 1,474×
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court· 1941-04-28· cited 1,282×
- National Broadcasting Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1943-05-10· cited 782×
- Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court· 1944-03-27· cited 708×
- Federal Power Commission v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Supreme Court· 1942-03-16· cited 598×
- Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court· 1923-06-11· cited 575×
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp.Supreme Court· 1956-02-27· cited 477×
- Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court· 1945-05-07· cited 461×
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1954-06-07· cited 440×
- Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co.Supreme Court· 1956-05-28· cited 371×
- Atlantic Refining Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court· 1959-06-22· cited 356×
- American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1953-03-09· cited 344×
- Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corp. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court· 1933-05-08· cited 303×
- United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. Abilene & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1924-05-26· cited 274×
- United States v. CorrickSupreme Court· 1936-05-18· cited 262×
- Tagg Bros. & Moorhead v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1930-02-24· cited 258×
- Covington & Lexington Turnpike Road Co. v. SandfordSupreme Court· 1896-12-14· cited 244×
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1967-10-09· cited 243×
Other cases named Permian Basin Area Rate Cases
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.