Perlman v. Martin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that telephone calls from a person in Washington, D.C. to New York for the purpose of retaining a lawyer were, by themselves, an insufficient basis for jurisdiction under the long arm statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pavlo v. James
  S.D. New York· 1977-10-19· cited 8×
• Amins v. Life Support Medical Equipment Corp.
  E.D. New York· 1974-03-29· cited 7×
• Etra v. Matta
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-07-14· cited 7×
• Schneider Corp. of America v. R. W. Borrowdale Co.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-10-20· cited 4×
• Reiner v. Durand
  S.D. New York· 1985-02-21· cited 3×
• Pennie & Edmonds v. Austad Co.
  S.D. New York· 1988-03-15· cited 2×
• Ladenburg, Thalmann & Co. v. Scalleat
  Civil Court of the City of New York· 1976-04-20

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• International Shoe Co. v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
• Reich v. Pines Hotel
  Civil Court of the City of New York· 1972-02-03· cited 1×

Other cases named Perlman v. Martin

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Perlman v. Martin
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1973-07-30