· 2/21/1985
Reiner v. Durand
Citations
- 602 F. Supp. 849
- 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22418
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendants’ con tacts included retention of New York counsel, who rendered services to defendant in New York and who met with defendants’ agent on several occasions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kram
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.