Skip to main content
· 2/21/1985

Reiner v. Durand

Citations

  • 602 F. Supp. 849
  • 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22418

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendants’ con tacts included retention of New York counsel, who rendered services to defendant in New York and who met with defendants’ agent on several occasions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kram

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.