Perez v. Perez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting Congressional intent that benefit received under section 687 following involuntary release from armed services deemed non-earned gratuity to service member to aid readjustment to civilian life, not payment for service previously rendered
• former husband's military separation pay, received several years after divorce, held his separate property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Licata v. Licata
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2000-02-17· cited 57×
• Dutton v. Dutton
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2000-05-04· cited 52×
• Ex Parte Johnson
  Texas Supreme Court· 1979-12-12· cited 42×
• Abernethy v. Fishkin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-06-10· cited 29×
• In Re Marriage of Kuzmiak
  California Court of Appeal· 1986-01-27· cited 25×
• Moreno v. Alejandro
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1989-07-12· cited 19×
• In Re the Marriage of Holmes
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1992-10-08· cited 16×
• In Re the Marriage of Bishop
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-12-11· cited 14×
• Trahan v. Trahan
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1980-11-18· cited 7×
• Arrambide v. Arrambide
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1980-06-04· cited 3×
• White v. White
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-05-05· cited 3×
• Richard Lee Marsh v. Wanda Maria Wallace
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1996-06-05
• James Truman Henslee v. Mary Glenda Henslee
  Tex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2010-07-30