Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1/23/2015

Perez v. Fay

Citations

  • 160 So. 3d 459
  • 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 811
  • 2015 WL 292016

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a final judgment was legally deficient when it failed to advise a parent of the necessary steps to regain contact with the children
  • finding that “the amended supplemental final judgment is legally deficient on its face because it does not set forth what steps the Mother must take 4 to regain primary residential custody and/or meaningful unsupervised time-sharing with her daughter”
  • “[T]he expenses of visitation are part of the parties’ childrearing expenses that must be addressed as part of the parties’ child support obligations.”
  • “[A] parent’s visitation rights may not be conditioned on the payment of the parent’s financial obligations.” (quoting Hastings v. Rigsbee, 875 So.2d 772, 777 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Villanti, Khouzam, Wallace

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Perez v. Fay

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.