Schutz v. Schutz

Citations

• 2017 Ohio 695

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in finding a change of circumstances and in finding that it is in the best interests of the parties' minor children for custody to be changed from Appellant to Appellee. The trial court also did not abuse its discretion by accepting the testimony of the guardian ad litem, nor did the court abuse its discretion by finding Appellant in contempt for failing to comply with orders pertaining to parenting time. In addition, the trial court did not err in failing to find Appellee guilty of contempt, in failing to credit the testimony of an expert witness, or in imputing income to Appellant for purposes of child support. Finally, any issues pertaining to interim orders of the trial court are moot, in view of the final judgment entered by the trial court. Affirmed.