Skip to main content

Perez v. Cain

Citations

  • 367 Or. 96
  • 473 P.3d 540

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the petitioner could reasonably have raised an open question of statutory construction before case law decided the question
  • collecting cases in which the Supreme Court held that “an intervening change in case law was sufficiently novel or surprising that a petitioner’s claim based on the change in law could not reasonably have been asserted earlier”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garrett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.