· 9/27/2013
Perez Santana v. Holder
Citations
- 731 F.3d 50
- 2013 WL 5394311
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 19820
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he provision unambiguously confers upon ‘an alien’ the authority and the right to file a motion to reopen, in language that admits of no exceptions.”
- “[T]he postdeparture bar [8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(d)] cannot be used to abrogate a noncitizen’s statutory right to file a motion to reopen.”
- “This provision shows that Congress knew how to impose a geographic restriction when it wanted to, and further suggests that the statute’s general provisions do not contain such a limitation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howard, Lipez, Kayatta
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.