Skip to main content
· 9/27/2013

Perez Santana v. Holder

Citations

  • 731 F.3d 50
  • 2013 WL 5394311
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 19820

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he provision unambiguously confers upon ‘an alien’ the authority and the right to file a motion to reopen, in language that admits of no exceptions.”
  • “[T]he postdeparture bar [8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(d)] cannot be used to abrogate a noncitizen’s statutory right to file a motion to reopen.”
  • “This provision shows that Congress knew how to impose a geographic restriction when it wanted to, and further suggests that the statute’s general provisions do not contain such a limitation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howard, Lipez, Kayatta

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.