Union Pacific R. Co. v. Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen Gen. Comm. of Adjustment, Central Region

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that administrative agencies directed by Congress to adjudicate particular controversies may not contract their own jurisdiction through regulation or decision
• holding that “there is surely a starting presumption that when jurisdiction is conferred, a court may not decline to exercise it”
• holding that a procedural rule under the Railway Labor Act requiring proof of a pre-arbitration settlement conference is not jurisdictional under Arbaugh
• recognizing that the word “jurisdiction” has been used by courts, including the Supreme Court, to convey “many, too many, meanings.”
• concluding that the Immigration Judge's \jurisdiction\ under § 1003.14 refers to subject matter jurisdiction
• concluding that failure administratively to exhaust results in a lack of subject-matter jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).