Peralta v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The trial court’s findings of fact on motion for new trial are upheld unless clearly erroneous.” (Citations omitted.)
• trial court’s findings of fact on motion for new trial are upheld unless clearly erroneous
• “The trial court’s findings of fact on motion for new trial are upheld unless clearly erroneous. [Cits.]”
• trial court noted witness made a post-trial statement professing that he gave false testimony at defendant’s trial in order to avoid being perceived as a snitch
• “The trial court’s findings of fact on motion for new trial are upheld unless clearly erroneous.” (Citations omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cook v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-12-12· cited 31×
• Nwakanma v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2015-01-20· cited 28×
• Lewis v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2004-01-20· cited 19×
• Neugent v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-10-29· cited 11×
• Thornton v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2005-10-03· cited 10×
• Alwin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-04-23· cited 5×
• Cooper v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2010-10-04· cited 5×
• LOVE v. the STATE.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2019-03-07· cited 5×
• Dailey v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-10-01· cited 4×
• Coggins v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2013-10-21· cited 3×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Malcolm v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1993-09-20· cited 1,049×
• Cromartie v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1999-03-08· cited 45×
• White v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-06-25· cited 24×