Illinois Supreme Court· 5/21/1992
People v. Wright
Citations
- 594 N.E.2d 276
- 149 Ill. 2d 36
- 171 Ill. Dec. 424
- 1992 Ill. LEXIS 90
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that section 122-5 of the Act grants the trial court a great deal of discretion
- recognizing that section 122-5 of the Act grants the trial court a great deal of discretion
- finding postconviction counsel “substantially complied with the mandate of Rule 651(c)”
- finding postconviction counsel \substantially complied with the mandate of Rule 651(c)\
- failure to present the defendant's mental health records was not ineffective, as no prejudice could be shown
- failure to present the defendant’s mental health records was not ineffective, as no prejudice could be shown
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cunningham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. FloresIllinois Supreme Court· 1992-11-19· cited 538×
- People v. TurnerIllinois Supreme Court· 1999-09-23· cited 310×
- People v. PinkonslyIllinois Supreme Court· 2003-11-20· cited 227×
- People v. RichardsonIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-02-17· cited 212×
- People v. WhiteheadIllinois Supreme Court· 1996-02-15· cited 190×
- People v. SanchezIllinois Supreme Court· 1996-01-18· cited 169×
- People v. RiveraIllinois Supreme Court· 2001-12-06· cited 159×
- People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court· 1998-06-18· cited 135×
- People v. WrightIllinois Supreme Court· 1999-11-18· cited 117×
- People v. WileyIllinois Supreme Court· 1995-03-30· cited 101×
- People v. MunsonIllinois Supreme Court· 2002-06-20· cited 100×
- People v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois· 2011-08-05· cited 94×
- People v. WatsonIllinois Supreme Court· 1999-09-23· cited 54×
- People v. RichardsonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2008-04-21· cited 54×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2000-03-31· cited 53×
- People v. MarkiewiczAppellate Court of Illinois· 1993-06-22· cited 50×
- People v. CollinsAppellate Court of Illinois· 2021-03-31· cited 37×
- People v. SotoAppellate Court of Illinois· 2022-06-29· cited 29×
- People v. EnglishAppellate Court of Illinois· 2008-04-08· cited 28×
- People v. GaleAppellate Court of Illinois· 2007-09-07· cited 27×
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1973-04-23· cited 3,699×
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1985-02-26· cited 3,332×
- Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1982-01-19· cited 3,271×
- Zant v. StephensSupreme Court· 1983-06-22· cited 2,410×
- People v. AlbaneseIllinois Supreme Court· 1984-10-19· cited 1,967×
- Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court· 1974-06-17· cited 1,488×
- Mayer v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court· 1971-12-13· cited 487×
- People v. BeanIllinois Supreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 332×
- People v. GreerIllinois Supreme Court· 1980-02-22· cited 298×
- People v. PorterIllinois Supreme Court· 1988-04-05· cited 291×
- People v. OwensIllinois Supreme Court· 1990-11-30· cited 219×
- People v. SimmsIllinois Supreme Court· 1991-04-18· cited 210×
- The PEOPLE v. SlaughterIllinois Supreme Court· 1968-03-28· cited 166×
- People v. WrightIllinois Supreme Court· 1986-02-21· cited 120×
- People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court· 1989-06-19· cited 107×
- People v. PierIllinois Supreme Court· 1972-03-21· cited 103×
- People Ex Rel. Daley v. FitzgeraldIllinois Supreme Court· 1988-06-20· cited 92×
- People v. JacksonIllinois Supreme Court· 1991-09-26· cited 73×
- People v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court· 1972-09-20· cited 55×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.