Skip to main content

People v. Woods

Citations

  • 684 N.E.2d 1053
  • 292 Ill. App. 3d 172
  • 226 Ill. Dec. 57
  • 1997 Ill. App. LEXIS 638

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it is proper for the prosecution to comment on the failure of a defendant to produce alibi witnesses when those witnesses are identified in the defense’s opening statement, or by defense witnesses, whether on direct or cross-examination
  • holding that it is proper for the prosecution to comment on the failure of a defendant to produce alibi witnesses when those witnesses are identified in the defense's opening statement, or by defense witnesses, whether on direct or cross-examination
  • holding that it is proper for the prosecution to comment on the failure of a defendant to produce alibi witnesses when those witnesses are identified in the defense’s opening statement, or by defense witnesses, whether on direct or cross-examination
  • defendant’s exculpatory statements made to police regarding his alibi constitute inadmissible hearsay
  • defendant's exculpatory statements made to police regarding his alibi constitute inadmissible hearsay
  • defendant's exculpatory statements made to police regarding his alibi constitute inadmissible hearsay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steigmann, Cook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.