Skip to main content

People v. Bramlett

Citations

  • 658 N.E.2d 510
  • 213 Ill. Dec. 40
  • 276 Ill. App. 3d 201
  • 1995 Ill. App. LEXIS 890

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the denial of a continuance does not constitute an abuse of discretion “where there is no reasonable expectation that the witness will be available in the foreseeable future”
  • noting that courts should examine the following factors when reviewing the denial of a request for a continuance sought to secure the presence of a witness: (a) whether defendant was diligent in attempting to secure the witness for trial; (b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCullough, Steigmann

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.