People v. Witt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “a plain reading of the statute discloses that it encompasses two distinct offenses, namely, bank robbery involving assaultive conduct and safecracking”
• armed robbery and vault robbery serve different societal interests, hence multiple punishments are valid
• armed robbery and vault robbery serve different societal interests, hence multiple punishments are valid

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Ford
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2004-09-01· cited 57×
• People v. Harding
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2006-04-07· cited 53×
• People v. Cochran
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1986-08-13· cited 14×
• People v. Campbell
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1987-12-08· cited 13×
• People v. Shipe
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1991-08-19· cited 5×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Blockburger v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
• Bell v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1955-05-09· cited 1,300×
• People v. Robideau
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 408×
• In Re Guilty Plea Cases
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1975-11-07· cited 383×
• People v. Gilbert
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1982-09-28· cited 55×
• People v. Johnson
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1981-03-30· cited 42×
• People v. Adams
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1983-08-16· cited 20×
• People v. Thomas
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1982-08-23· cited 14×
• People v. Ferguson
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1975-04-08· cited 12×
• People v. Avery
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1982-04-23· cited 3×