Skip to main content

People v. Williams

Citations

  • 535 N.E.2d 993
  • 180 Ill. App. 3d 294
  • 129 Ill. Dec. 228
  • 1989 Ill. App. LEXIS 217

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding, despite State’s claim of forfeiture and despite the lack of a plain-error argument by the defendant, for a hearing to determine defendant’s ability to pay restitution, as required by the Code
  • “Rebuttal evidence limited to contradicting the defendant’s prior testimony does not raise new matters.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Quinlan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.