People v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[defendant is entitled to instructions on insanity only where a jury’s finding of insanity would be supported by a preponderance of the evidence”
• “[d]efendant is entitled to instructions on insanity only where a jury’s finding of insanity would be supported by a preponderance of the evidence”
• defendant’s absence from portions of the voir dire, all actual challenges to prospective jurors and interviews of two jurors, did not result in plain error or deprive him of a right to a trial by an impartial jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Benford
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2004-06-30· cited 73×
• People v. Markiewicz
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-06-22· cited 50×
• People v. Wilson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-11-24· cited 37×
• People v. Whitamore
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-02-25· cited 20×
• People v. Dwight
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-11-21· cited 15×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Albanese
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1984-10-19· cited 1,967×
• People v. Caballero
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1984-03-23· cited 434×
• People v. Lindgren
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1980-02-22· cited 352×
• People v. Bean
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 332×
• People v. Stewart
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1984-11-30· cited 323×
• People v. Kimbrough
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-11-20· cited 142×
• People v. Andrews
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1989-12-21· cited 119×
• People v. Schmidt
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1988-04-06· cited 43×
• People v. Moore
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-09-23· cited 37×
• People v. MacKey
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-12-24· cited 15×
• People v. McCoy
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1987-05-22· cited 9×