Skip to main content

People v. Williams

Citations

  • 551 N.E.2d 631
  • 133 Ill. 2d 449
  • 141 Ill. Dec. 444
  • 1990 Ill. LEXIS 21

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the phrase “other than a lawful purpose” in child abduction statute applies only to violations of the criminal code and not to violations of administrative regulations or city ordinances
  • holding that the phrase \other than a lawful purpose\ in child abduction statute applies only to violations of the criminal code and not to violations of administrative regulations or city ordinances
  • holding that the phrase “other than a lawful purpose” in child abduction statute applies only to violations of the criminal code and not to violations of administrative regulations or city ordinances
  • “luring or attempted luring of a child into an automobile for a criminal purpose is in no way protected by the first amendment”
  • in case involving child abduction statute, the State may “validly proscribe the luring or attempted luring of children into motor vehicles for criminal purposes, although that attempt may involve speech”
  • in case involving child abduction statute, the State may “validly proscribe the luring or attempted luring of children into motor vehicles for criminal purposes, although that attempt may involve speech”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ryan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.