People v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the trial court's findings of fact were supported by the record and its conclusion correctly applied the pertinent law
• The court has a duty to “insure that its instructions are couched in neutral terms to avoid any implication that it regards certain facts to be established.”
• section 18-1-409 sets time limitation for appellate court’s review of defendant’s sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• in Interest of M.H-K
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2018-12-13· cited 876×
• People v. Cook
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2014-03-27· cited 177×
• People v. Sorrendino
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2001-08-30· cited 25×
• People v. Butler
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2009-07-09· cited 11×
• People v. Dawson
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2003-08-28· cited 5×
• State v. Higgenbottom
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-11-16· cited 4×
• Joseph L. Williams v. Randy Henderson Attorney General of the State of Colorado
  Tenth Circuit· 1997-04-14· cited 2×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• North Carolina v. Pearce
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
• United States v. Goodwin
  Supreme Court· 1982-06-18· cited 1,581×
• Texas v. McCullough
  Supreme Court· 1986-02-26· cited 534×
• People v. Tenneson
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1990-04-02· cited 74×
• People v. Thomas
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1994-01-31· cited 71×
• People v. Duran
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1975-04-14· cited 64×
• People v. Mitchell
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1991-06-20· cited 10×
• People v. Walters
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1990-08-09· cited 4×