California Court of Appeal· 12/17/1985
People v. Wells
Citations
- 175 Cal. App. 3d 876
- 221 Cal. Rptr. 273
- 1985 Cal. App. LEXIS 2884
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding no violation of PCA where military police officers were undercover informants under supervision and surveillance of local police department
- Undercover NIS agent’s participation in undercover narcotics transaction in cooperation with local law enforcement did not violate the federal Posse Comitatus Act.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lewis, Wiener, Kintner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Larry Charbert Hayes v. Warden Hawes and Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General for the State of IllinoisSeventh Circuit· 1990-12-18· cited 52×
- State v. CooperNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-10-27· cited 12×
- City of Airway Heights v. DilleyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-08-21· cited 10×
- People v. HayesAppellate Court of Illinois· 1986-06-24· cited 6×
- Kim v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1991-09-05· cited 3×
- Hall v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1990-07-26
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chandler v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 1948-12-03· cited 94×
- United States v. Ruby Davidson Walden and William Luther WaldenFourth Circuit· 1974-01-10· cited 90×
- United States v. McArthurD. North Dakota· 1976-06-23· cited 35×
- Wrynn v. United StatesE.D. New York· 1961-12-20· cited 25×
- People v. BurdenMichigan Supreme Court· 1981-03-30· cited 14×
- People v. BlendCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1981-06-30· cited 11×
- Walden v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.