Skip to main content

People v. Weinstein

Citations

  • 386 N.E.2d 593
  • 68 Ill. App. 3d 883
  • 25 Ill. Dec. 322
  • 1979 Ill. App. LEXIS 2106

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • interpreting the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in McKeiver as follows: \implicit in the rationale of the holding is that a jury trial is not a fundamental concept of due process\
  • interpreting the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in McKeiver as follows: \implicit in the rationale of the holding is that a jury trial is not a fundamental concept of due process\
  • “The use of ‘the court’ by the legislature suggests that the court is to be the trier of fact in [termination] proceedings.”
  • no right to jury trial in proceeding to terminate parental rights under Illinois Juvenile Court Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1975, ch. 37, par. 701 — 1 et seq.)
  • no right to jury trial in proceeding to terminate parental rights under Illinois Juvenile Courts Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Perlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.