D.C. Circuit· 2/19/1953
In Re Lambert
Citations
- 203 F.2d 607
- 92 U.S. App. D.C. 104
- 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 3408
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- cases involving custody of children traditionally heard and determined by chancellor or judge exercising equity jurisdiction
- cases involving custody of children traditionally heard and determined by chancellor or judge exercising equity jurisdiction
- cases involving custody of children traditionally heard and determined by chancellor or judge exercising equity jurisdiction
- noting equitable nature of juvenile proceedings
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clark, Prettyman, Proctor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United Shoe Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. Catherine Bedell, ChairmanD.C. Circuit· 1974-10-23· cited 80×
- Nieves v. United StatesS.D. New York· 1968-03-05· cited 55×
- Max Putnam and Elizabeth Putnam v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueEighth Circuit· 1955-08-11· cited 30×
- E.R.B. v. J.H.F.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-08-12· cited 25×
- In Re SippyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1953-06-11· cited 15×
- People v. WeinsteinAppellate Court of Illinois· 1979-02-06· cited 10×
- In Re ElmoreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1966-08-31· cited 8×
- Shioutakon v. District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 1955-06-24· cited 5×
- Alyssa B. v. State, DhssAlaska Supreme Court· 2005-08-05· cited 2×
- Erb v. JHFDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-08-12
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.