Michigan Court of Appeals· 5/19/1999
People v. Walker
Citations
- 593 N.W.2d 673
- 234 Mich. App. 299
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that failure to file a proof of service of the intent to seek an enhanced habitual-offender sentence was harmless and did not require resentencing
- holding that the failure to file a proof of service with the notice of intent, while erroneous, did not entitle the defendant to relief because it was undisputed that the defendant had appropriate notice
- holding that the prosecutor’s failure to file a proof of service of the intent to seek an enhanced habitual-offender sentence with the clerk of the court was harmless and did not require resentencing because defendant had received actual notice of the enhancement
- holding that the prosecution’s failure to file a proof of service of the intent to seek an enhanced habitual-offender sentence with the clerk of the court was harmless and did not require resentencing because defendant had received actual notice of the enhancement
- statutes punishing destruction of property of another by any means, and burning any personal property whether owned by himself or another, protect distinct societal norms
- harmless error in failing to file proof of notice of intent to enhance sentence where the defendant only argues that the court did not receive the notice required by MCL 769.13(2)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Whitbeck, Cavanagh, Griffin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People of Michigan v. Christopher Duran HeadMichigan Court of Appeals· 2018-03-27· cited 369×
- People v. HerndonMichigan Court of Appeals· 2001-09-06· cited 198×
- In Re CareyMichigan Court of Appeals· 2000-08-29· cited 68×
- People v. PfaffleMichigan Court of Appeals· 2001-08-23· cited 49×
- People v. MacKleMichigan Court of Appeals· 2000-09-19· cited 46×
- People v. KulpinskiMichigan Court of Appeals· 2000-12-19· cited 25×
- Strickland v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2004-07-30· cited 19×
- People v. SquiresMichigan Court of Appeals· 2000-06-22· cited 16×
- Redmond v. WorthintonE.D. Michigan· 2012-07-17· cited 9×
- People v. DavisMichigan Court of Appeals· 2002-07-30· cited 2×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 3,552×
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court· 1983-01-19· cited 2,324×
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 2,221×
- United States v. JornSupreme Court· 1971-01-25· cited 2,215×
- Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court· 1990-05-29· cited 1,620×
- Gavieres v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1911-04-03· cited 625×
- People v. GravesMichigan Supreme Court· 1998-07-30· cited 425×
- People v. RobideauMichigan Supreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 408×
- People v. DenioMichigan Supreme Court· 1997-06-17· cited 106×
- People v. LugoMichigan Court of Appeals· 1995-12-28· cited 69×
- People v. ConnorMichigan Court of Appeals· 1995-03-20· cited 42×
- People v. PeerenboomMichigan Court of Appeals· 1997-09-11· cited 20×
- People v. AyersMichigan Court of Appeals· 1995-10-06· cited 12×
- People v. JohnsonMichigan Court of Appeals· 1989-04-03· cited 6×
- People v. GriffisMichigan Court of Appeals· 1996-09-27· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.