· 5/8/1990
People v. Velasco
Citations
- 554 N.E.2d 1094
- 197 Ill. App. 3d 589
- 144 Ill. Dec. 55
- 1990 Ill. App. LEXIS 636
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Rule 604(d) gave defendant the right to consult with appointed counsel in the presentment of a pro se motion
- holding that Rule 604(d) gave defendant the right to consult with appointed counsel in the presentment of a pro se motion
- holding that Rule 604(d) gave defendant the right to consult with appointed counsel in the presentment of a pro se motion
- repeatedly characterizing as a “motion” the defendant’s letter stating his desire to withdraw his plea because his sentence was excessive for a first-time offender
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dunn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.