New York Court of Appeals· 12/17/1992
People v. Mitchell
Citations
- 80 N.Y.2d 519
- 606 N.E.2d 1381
- 591 N.Y.S.2d 990
- 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 4229
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “the Antommarchi rule is not compelled by Federal law” and that “limited exclusion from side-bar discussions with prospective jurors ... will not violate a defendant’s [federal] constitutional right to be present”
- discussing that the Antommarchi rule was a recognition of a statutory violation of § 260.20 and thus, “is not compelled by Federal law ....”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Simons
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
146 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. RudolphNew York Court of Appeals· 2013-06-27· cited 406×
- People v. MaherNew York Court of Appeals· 1996-12-19· cited 314×
- People v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals· 1995-07-06· cited 287×
- People v. RomanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1995-07-20· cited 249×
- People v. VasquezNew York Court of Appeals· 1996-07-02· cited 245×
- People v. FavorNew York Court of Appeals· 1993-10-19· cited 223×
- People v. VargasNew York Court of Appeals· 1996-06-13· cited 165×
- People v. MoralesNew York Court of Appeals· 1992-12-17· cited 131×
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-01-26· cited 92×
- People v. SprowalNew York Court of Appeals· 1994-06-16· cited 81×
- People v. HillNew York Court of Appeals· 1995-02-16· cited 76×
- People v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1993-04-14· cited 39×
- People v. CrespoNew York Court of Appeals· 2018-10-16· cited 32×
- Bailey v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2000-10-12· cited 30×
- People v. FrattaNew York Court of Appeals· 1994-02-10· cited 29×
- People v. SorbelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2001-08-27· cited 29×
- People v. CamachoNew York Court of Appeals· 1997-07-01· cited 26×
- People v. RichardsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1993-05-20· cited 23×
- People v. HanniganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1993-08-30· cited 21×
- People v. UnderwoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1994-02-14· cited 21×
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 6,066×
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1987-01-13· cited 3,380×
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 2,898×
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1934-01-08· cited 2,822×
- United States v. GagnonSupreme Court· 1985-05-13· cited 1,062×
- People v. AntommarchiNew York Court of Appeals· 1992-10-27· cited 745×
- American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 358×
- People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals· 1985-11-26· cited 331×
- People v. DokesNew York Court of Appeals· 1992-06-11· cited 296×
- People v. VelascoNew York Court of Appeals· 1991-04-04· cited 267×
- People v. MoralesNew York Court of Appeals· 1975-06-17· cited 200×
- People v. BollingNew York Court of Appeals· 1992-04-03· cited 162×
- People v. P. J. Video, Inc.New York Court of Appeals· 1986-10-28· cited 152×
- People v. SloanNew York Court of Appeals· 1992-04-07· cited 146×
- People v. PepperNew York Court of Appeals· 1981-06-16· cited 142×
- People v. MoralesNew York Court of Appeals· 1992-12-17· cited 131×
- Gager v. WhiteNew York Court of Appeals· 1981-07-07· cited 106×
- Patchogue-Medford Congress of Teachers v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals· 1987-06-09· cited 87×
- People v. WebbNew York Court of Appeals· 1991-10-15· cited 37×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.