People v. Torres

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Interpretations of federal antitrust law are at most instructive, not conclusive, when construing the Cartwright Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Hurtado
  California Supreme Court· 2002-08-22· cited 119×
• People v. Roberge
  California Supreme Court· 2003-02-06· cited 115×
• People v. Scott
  California Court of Appeal· 2002-08-01· cited 20×
• Hubbs v. Alamao
  C.D. California· 2005-02-14· cited 13×
• People v. Carmony
  California Court of Appeal· 2002-06-13· cited 12×
• People v. Burris
  California Court of Appeal· 2002-10-10· cited 10×
• People v. Howard
  California Court of Appeal· 2002-07-15· cited 10×
• People v. Krah
  California Court of Appeal· 2003-12-17· cited 9×
• People v. Yartz
  California Court of Appeal· 2003-06-30· cited 1×
• People v. Torres
  California Court of Appeal· 2002-07-17
• In Re American Express Anti-Steering Rules Antitrust Litigation
  Second Circuit· 2021-11-22

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Gardeley
  California Supreme Court· 1996-12-23· cited 783×
• Hubbart v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1999-01-21· cited 324×
• Diamond Multimedia Systems, Inc. v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1999-01-04· cited 235×
• In Re Parker
  California Court of Appeal· 1998-01-22· cited 50×