Skip to main content

People v. Torres

Citations

  • 613 N.E.2d 338
  • 245 Ill. App. 3d 297
  • 184 Ill. Dec. 311
  • 1993 Ill. App. LEXIS 631

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting a rule that would have required the State to present all exculpatory evidence it may have to the grand jury
  • rejecting a rule that would have required the State to present all exculpatory evidence it may have to the grand jury
  • “Defendant does not satisfy his burden to establish clearly ‘actual and substantial prejudice’ merely by demonstrating the possibility of avoiding indictment.”
  • “[although the State has no general duty to present exculpatory evidence to the grand jury, we recognize the possibility that, under certain circumstances, a prosecutor’s intentional withholding of such evidence could result in a denial of a defendant’s right to due process”
  • “[a]lthough the State has no general duty to present exculpatory evidence to the grand jury, we recognize the possibility that, under certain circumstances, a prosecutor’s intentional withholding of such evidence could result in a denial of a defendant’s right to due process”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Doyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.